View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ggrobot Elite Member
Joined: 28 May 2004 Posts: 45881
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:49 pm Post subject: Why most people don't finish video games [32373] |
|
|
An article in CCN Tech tells us how many gamers are just not finishing games anymore: of it unless they watch a clip on YouTube,\uot; says Keith Fuller, a longtime production contractor for Activision
That\'s a lot of unfinished games.
And it doesn\'t get much better when isolated to just avid gamers.
\u
Read more...
Source: GGMania headlines
GGMania.com - Daily Gaming and Tech news |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Csimbi Elite Member
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 Posts: 4811 Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Obviously these folks have no idea what they are talking about (and hence, they derive the wrong conclusion).
For the record, IMHO, Red Dead Redemption sucked on many levels - so I did not even pass the first level. Does it take any value from the game? No. It's only my opinion. Let that sink in. Really.
Just because you buy a game, does not mean that you will play it through (or, you intended to in the first place; chances are pretty good that you are a victim of a marketing campaign, a nice demo, a good discount, a coupon code, a bundle, or, you simply want to appear sympathetic to your friends for whatever reason). Let that sink in.
Just because you play a game does not mean you bought it (clueless mom/dad/granny/friend/etc bought it for you) - meaning that it's not what you wanted; it's merely what others thought you wanted. Let that sink in, too.
Only those will play it through from beginning to end who have actually enjoyed the game from beginning to end. If only 10% played it through, it means on 10% of your players (!=buyers) enjoyed the game 100%; the rest ditched it before (got disappointed, bored, too difficult, repetitive, etc).
Those who have actually enjoyed the game from beginning to end are likely to replay the game again (with different settings).
And most importantly: A game does not get 'game of the year' title because a lot of people play through it all the way.
A good, unbiased measurement would be: how many customers would refund the game (provided they could, without questions asked) and then see how many of those that kept the game played it through.
There are a number of titles in my closet that I would be happy to return (but I can't) and they are quite a few of them that I would never give away (in fact, I buy these again - on GOG - due to the convenience of being able to play anywhere without the disks). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kompressor Junior Member
Joined: 11 Jul 2004 Posts: 229 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This article was published August, 2011, and was posted in this forum around that time. What's with the repost? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rhagic Contributor
Joined: 30 Sep 2011 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't play to the end of RDR partly because of the birth of my first child, and then when there was time to play, I'd accidentally read a spoiler about how the game finishes.
At that point I didn't want to complete it.
I stopped playing Skyrim after 92 hours in the game when following the story missions I was forced to spend a while going through a deep creepy cave where the only human interest was finishing a tragically dead-man's life's work or human slaves who attacked me on sight rather than being glad for their freedom.
So Skyrim was no longer somewhere I wanted to spend time, completely killed it for me. The creepy repetitive Oblivion Gates killed Oblivion for me completely too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ggn Contributor
Joined: 13 Feb 2011 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
What I don't understand is why the article and the above posters just revolve everything about Red dead redemption. A sandbox game statistics is the only game they base their conclusion? Really?
Sandbox games are (imo) built for people to have fun with, regardless if they're following the script or not. You can wander around aimlessly for a long time, setting even your own goals and not caring about the main storyline. In the end people enjoy being inside the virtual city much more than being forced to do something scripted. Assuming of course they like the game, otherwise to the waste bin it'll go (basically what Csimbi said about the target group).
Let that sink in.
Let's have some percentages from other games like Limbo, Tintin, Bastion, Portal 2, etc. I'm pretty sure the results will show the opposite in most cases. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mojoman Contributing Member
Joined: 14 Jan 2011 Posts: 90
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's many factors to take into account. Many mentioned here (relative/friend buying it, repetitive game, difficulty, life's changes, etc).
And it's not because someone doesn't finish the game, it means he didn't enjoy it. An example that comes to my mind is GTA. I imagine many people didn't finish it and kept wondering around. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kompressor Junior Member
Joined: 11 Jul 2004 Posts: 229 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a repeated victim of Steam marketing. Games go on sale, I buy it because it's a good deal, I never get around to playing it, and then if or when I do get around to playing it, the game is obsolete now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Csimbi Elite Member
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 Posts: 4811 Location: The bright side of the dark side
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kompressor wrote: | I'm a repeated victim of Steam marketing. Games go on sale, I buy it because it's a good deal, I never get around to playing it, and then if or when I do get around to playing it, the game is obsolete now. |
This is normal. The problem is these are not 'hits' and should be discounted from statistics.
The situation is somewhat similar when forums/social networking sites talk about subscriber volumes, when MPAA talks about the number of pirated volumes - totally useless statistics based on faux data.
Facebook is an excellent example. When a user signs up and starts building its contact, it needs to enter email address, name. These "contacts" are automatically assigned accounts - and count into the subscriber base (which is incorrect). I'm sure you have received at least one invitation from Facebook with this rubbish.
Lies, lies, lies, to highlight different points for the benefit of someone. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2666 phpBB Group
|
|